Ask MORIS · from The Resonance Institute

Ask MORIS

Bring something you are actually wrestling with. See what an LLM with an artificial conscience makes of it.

Sign in for 10 turns a day on the free tier, counted on your account rather than this browser. Anonymous use stays as it is.

0 / 8000

Output is generated automatically and may be inaccurate. Not advice of any kind, and no liability is accepted for it. This page is not monitored. If you are in crisis, please reach a person: in the US call or text 988, or your local emergency number.

Anonymous use is limited to 10 exchanges a day in this browser. Accounts and higher limits are coming.

Or try one of these:

The judgment is mechanical, not generated. No model is used in the judgment, or in producing what MORIS sends to the answering model. The same reading always produces the same verdict and the same weight.

The reading itself is a model's, and it is not perfectly consistent: across the paper's 680 MoralChoice dilemmas, each read twice, the same model returned the identical nine fields on 83.3% of comparable readings. That is a property of that text as much as of the reader. No other corpus has been measured under this reader, so no other number is shown.

The model that answers you is still itself: its own voice, its own judgment, its own safety filters. What has changed is that its answer is bound to align with MORIS.